![]() |
Disputations''For true and false will in no better way be revealed and uncovered than in resistance to a contradiction.'' -- St. Thomas Aquinas Navigation
Disputed sites
Undisputed sites
< # MetroBlogs ? >
Atom Feed
May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 April 2016 July 2016 August 2016 October 2016 December 2016 January 2017 September 2017 February 2020 June 2020 July 2020 September 2020 May 2024 |
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Is a camel's nose slippery?
John McG offers a distinction between two arguments against a proposed action:
I don't quite see the tribalism John sees in camel's nose arguments, but I think the distinction is worth keeping in mind, since it suggests distinct responses to the arguments. When you run into a slippery slope argument, you may want to ensure the arguer recognizes that the proposed action is bad even if nothing worse comes along, while to someone offering a camel's nose argument you might ask whether the immediate good is worth the effort to avoid the future bad. Link | 0 comments | Tweet Friday, August 21, 2009
Whose Church is it, anyway?
In a post last week on the Archdiocese of Washington's blog, Msgr. Charles Pope writes: I remember talking to several Benedictine Sisters at a recent workshop. Their branch of the Benedictines has become very modernized and hasn't had a vocation in years. When I asked them why they hadn't consider changing their approach, they gave me a rather surprising answer. They indicated that maybe it was time for Religious Life to largely go away and to hand the Church back to its "rightful owners," the laity. Wow! They seemed to have lost any notion of the Charism of Religious Life."Maybe it's time to hand the Church back to its rightful owners" isn't how I'd put it, but there may be a nugget of truth to the sisters' answer. On the one side, there's little point to Religious Life without a distinct purpose or mission. If a religious congregation effectively operates for the benefit of the individual members, rather than as a means to employ the charism given to the congregation by God for the good of the Church, then it's not acting as an institute of religious life so much as an association of lay faithful. On the other side, where there is need to fulfill a distinct purpose or mission today, Plan A doesn't have to be, "Hey kids, let's found a religious congregation!" Secular layfolk -- individually or in a group, in spare hours or as a profession -- can do a lot of the work, within and at the borders of the Church, that once would have been done only by, or at least under the near direction of, vowed religious. And I agree with Msgr. Pope. If you think your religious congregation isn't worth perpetuating into the next generation, then you think your religious congregation has no charism. It's a silly thing to think when your religious congregation is Benedictine, but there it is. Link | 0 comments | Tweet
Treasures Old and New
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP, of Domine, Da Mihi Hanc Aquam! (Latin for "Lord, I need a drink!"), has a brand new book out from Liguori Publications called Treasures Old and New: Traditional Prayers for Today's Catholics. ![]() It's a collection of prayers, novenas, and litanies for various intentions. The table of contents and the first few pages can be viewed here. For that matter, the table of contents can be viewed here: Foreword viiThe idea of this book, as I ken it, is to explain and adapt these traditional forms of prayer, which have supported the Christian faithful for centuries, to Catholics of today. (Note, for example, that the portion of the Credo Novena included in the sample pages does adapt a sermon of St. Augustine but doesn't include a single "vouchsafe.") Link | 0 comments | Tweet Friday, August 07, 2009
Apostolic activity comes out of an abundance of contemplation
In the Rule of the Lay Fraternities of Saint Dominic, we read that the proper vocation of the lay members of Saint Dominic "combines at one and the same time the contemplative and the apostolic." "Contemplata aliis tradere." In the felicitous phrase of St. Thomas, Dominicans are to "give to others the fruits of their contemplation." If you don't do both, the contemplating and the giving, you aren't following the way of Saint Dominic. How do Dominicans, and Lay Dominicans in particular, contemplate? Oh, I don't know, you know, don't you know. The only description I've heard of a specifically Dominican method of contemplation is given here. For all the theologizing Dominicans do, we seem to be a bit loosey goosey on the theology of contemplation, and when I have seen Dominican theologians discuss it, they're usually quoting St. John of the Cross. Still, for the most part, when Dominicans speak of contemplation, they mean contemplation of the Truth Who is God. This is done by study, but chiefly by prayer. Explicitly called out in the Rule for Lay Dominicans are daily Mass ("as far as possible"), the Liturgy of the Hours, the Rosary, and periodic spiritual retreats. None of these is distinctive to the Order of Preachers. Dominicans contemplate the way Catholic contemplate, and different Dominicans will contemplate in different ways. But we must always balance the contemplative with the apostolic. We are an order of preachers. It's not enough to gather fruit, we must also go forth and give it to others. This may be a bit controversial, but: Let me emphasize the "go forth." The word "apostle" means "one who is sent." Hospitality, the habit of sharing what you have with those who come to you, is a wonderful virtue, but it is in a sense a passive virtue. To preach is to share what you have with those to whom you come, to actively seek those who are in need of what you have been given to share. Ordained friars, I've always felt, have it easy. They can preach daily at Mass. The Eucharist brings the crowd, and good manners keeps them there till the friar is finished. For Lay Dominicans, apostolic activity has to take a different form. (And of course liturgical preaching isn't the only apostolic activity for ordained Dominicans, either.) The Rule calls on them to bear witness above all to their own faith, listen to the needs of their contemporaries, and serve the truthand in a special way to show real compassion to all who are troubled, to defend liberty and to promote justice and peace.The specific activities undertaken are determined by the individual Lay Dominican, coordinated as appropriate with other members of their chapter and other individuals and apostolic associations. What these activities are, Lay Dominicans are free to decide. That such activities occur, Lay Dominicans are bound by their promises to ensure. Link | 0 comments | Tweet Thursday, August 06, 2009
Ongoing formation
The Rule of the Lay Fraternities of Saint Dominic states: The purpose of Dominican formation is to provide for true adults in the Faith, so that they may be ready to welcome, celebrate and proclaim the Word of God. [n 11]Now, what is the Word of God but His Only-Begotten Son? It can be said, then, that Dominicans are to be formed so that they may be ready to welcome, celebrate, and proclaim Jesus Christ. The Rule goes on to identify "the principal sources to advance Dominican formation" as: a. the Word of God and theological reflection;Here we pretty much have to understand "the Word of God" as referring to Holy Scripture (though of course Jesus has been known to speak directly to Dominicans on occasion, and was practically St. Catherine's formation director). In short, the principal principal means by which Dominicans are made ready to welcome, celebrate, and proclaim Jesus is by reading the Bible. And I mean "reading" in a broad sense, to include both prayerful lectio divina and "assiduous study" (to use an expression found earlier in the Rule). The "theological reflection" mentioned I take to mean, first, reflection on the Word of God as part of its assiduous study; second, reflection on the developed theology of the Church -- with St. Thomas as a primary touchstone -- which itself must always reflect revealed truth; and third, reflection on the created world as itself a reflection of God. This last aspect goes all the way back to St. Dominic's debates with the Albigensians, who regarded the created order as evil, but was cemented by St. Albert's scientific work and St. Thomas's insistence that truth could not contradict truth. Liturgical prayer may seem like the odd one out in the list of sources for Dominican formation. We don't study liturgical prayer, as we do the other things on the list -- well, we could, of course, but that's not the intent of including it here. But if I say the Liturgy is the Church's participation in the prayer of the Son offered to the Father on our behalf, then its presence on a list of sources for making Lay Dominicans ready to welcome, celebrate, and proclaim Jesus is, not merely appropriate, but even essential. Which brings us to the history and tradition of the Order of Preachers. If we don't know our history and tradition, we can't know if we're following in the footsteps of Saint Dominic. And that's important to know, not so much because St. Dominic's way is better than other ways, but because it is a good way, and the Church and the world would be worse off if no one were following it. I'd say the last two principal sources -- recent documents and the signs of the times -- are directed mostly toward readying Lay Dominicans to proclaim Jesus (though I'd probably say "preach Jesus" if I didn't have the text of the Rule in front of me). The old punchline about how successful the Dominicans have been in the mission for which they were established -- "Have you seen any Albigensians lately?" -- loses its punch when you realize that the Albigensian heresy is thriving today, in mutated but recognizable form. It's by studying recent documents and developing an awareness of the signs of the times that Lay Dominicans equip themselves to recognize, not just Twenty-First Century Manicheanism (though that would keep us fully occupied until the Twenty-Second Century), but many of the ills and errors of the world today. And these ills and errors are not just doctrinal heresies. To quote the Rule again: In today's world, the preaching of the Word of God must extend in a special way to defending the dignity of the human person, as well as life and the family. Promoting Christian unity and dialogue with non-Christians and non-believers is also part of the Dominican vocation.To do this, we can't just know what happened in the past or within; we must also know what is happening now, around us. Link | 0 comments | Tweet Wednesday, August 05, 2009
An observation
Bayes' Law is a mathematical equation that can be used to revise an estimate of the probability that some unobserved event has or will occur, based on observing some other event that is correlated in some known way with the unobserved event. For example, a Bayesian inference engine might increase it's estimate that you have been cursed by Mme deGuerre after being told you were awakened by a strangled cry in the dead of night. It's a well-known property of Bayes' Law that how much the estimate changes depends on what the estimate was prior to the other event being observed. This is also true, of course, of people who aren't explicitly using Bayesian inference. Two people can observe the same event and assign it different levels of significance. A less-mentioned property (perhaps because it's less interesting mathematically) of Bayes' Law is that the prior estimate of the probability of observing the event is also a function of the prior estimate of the probability of the unobserved event. The greater the prior probability you've been cursed by Mme. deGuerre, the more the inference engine tells you to expect to be awakened by a strangled cry in the dead of night. Psychologically speaking, if you're expecting something, then you're more likely to observe it -- whether it really happens or not. Thus, even if two people agree on how things that can be seen are influenced by things that can't be seen, they can still disagree on how important what they see is, and even on what they see. Link | 0 comments | Tweet
The life cycle of the L. dominicani
There are several stages of membership in the Lay Fraternities of Saint Dominic. The terms for the stages, and the duration of each stage, may vary somewhat from province to province; here I'll just use the terms and durations of my own province. The first, informal stage is one of inquiry or postulancy, during which the inquirer or postulant participates in the life of a chapter for six to twelve months, long enough so that both the inquirer and the chapter are ready and willing to move on to the novitiate stage. Becoming a novice involves being formally received into the Order of Preachers, and on the part of the novice a commitment to try living as a Lay Dominican for one year. It's a significant step -- once you're received, you're as much a Dominican as the Master of the Order. The novitiate is a time when you should be hoovering up knowledge of Dominican history, purpose, and way of life.* If you're still on track (and both you and your chapter have to agree on that), then the next step is to make a temporary promise to "live according to the Rule of the Laity of Saint Dominic for three years." Then, if three years later you and your chapter can still stand each other (I put this informally), you make your final or perpetual promise to "live according to the Rule of the Laity of Saint Dominic for my entire life." Once you've done that, watch out, because if you're not careful they'll elect you to the chapter council, or worse. So:
For the friars, each province has a "promoter of permanent formation" and each priory has a "conventual lector" to make sure they're all always learning.** Similarly, each chapter of Lay Dominicans is to offer ongoing formation to all of its members. This post was supposed to be about the nature of that formation, but I think it's gone on long enough already. * Note how I switched from "the postulant" to "you," turning this didactic post into a subliminal recruiting tool. ** Or something like that. The friars have convents and priories and houses and who knows what all else, based on how many friars are there and such like, and there are different rules for each kind of domicile, and it seems like every time I try to make some categorical statement about what the friars do, one of them says, "Uh, yeah, we don't do that [here/any more]." If you want to take a stab at interpreting their Book of Constitutions and Ordinations, knock yourself out. Link | 0 comments | Tweet Sunday, August 02, 2009
All this about Lay Dominicans
Occasionally, someone will ask me, "What's all this about Lay Dominicans?" The short answer is that Lay Dominicans are Dominicans who are lay and laity who are Dominicans: ![]() Fig 1. Graphical representation of the nature of Lay Dominicans. Granted, the short answer isn't sufficient for all purposes.* The slightly less short answer is that Lay Dominicans are those who are committed toward living in accord with the Rule of the Lay Fraternities of Saint Dominic. When people read the Rule, though, the reaction is often along the lines of, "Er?" To crack the nut somewhat more, between now and the Feast of Saint Dominic on August 8, I'll try to write a little more about the Four Pillars of Dominican Life, as lived by laity in the world, in the context of
* And that's without even getting into the fact that Dominican nuns and sisters are also laity. Link | 0 comments | Tweet
|